Indemnification Clause

The clause that decides who pays when someone outside the contract sues.

No account, no card — the whole reading, in about half a minute.

What An Indemnification Clause Does

An indemnification clause is a promise by one party to cover the other party's losses when a third party brings a claim. It sits outside the ordinary machinery of breach and damages: it does not ask who broke the contract, it asks who agreed to carry the cost.

That is why it is the clause most likely to produce a liability larger than the contract itself. A supplier on a $10,000 engagement can agree, in one sentence, to fund a customer's defence of a claim brought by someone neither of them has met.

Two words change its scope more than any others. "Any and all claims" removes the requirement that the claim have anything to do with the indemnifying party's conduct. "Defend", added to "indemnify and hold harmless", obliges you to fund lawyers from the day a claim is filed — before anyone has decided whether it has merit.

In plain language

“If someone sues my customer over something connected to this deal, I pay — and how much I pay depends entirely on how widely this paragraph is written.”

The Clause, As It Usually Arrives

Nothing below is unusual drafting. That is what makes it worth reading twice.

The wording

The Supplier shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Customer, its affiliates, officers and employees from any and all claims, losses, damages, liabilities and expenses (including legal fees) arising out of or relating to this Agreement.

What it means once it is in force

"Arising out of or relating to" covers claims the supplier did not cause, including ones caused by the customer. "Affiliates" extends the promise to companies the supplier has never dealt with. There is no cap, so the obligation is unbounded, and "defend" makes it start before liability is decided. Nothing in the sentence is unusual — that is the point.

General information about a common drafting pattern, not legal advice about your document.

What Can Go Wrong

Exposure that exceeds the whole value of the contract, and typically exceeds any insurance held for it.
An obligation triggered by conduct that was not yours — a mutual indemnity written one-sidedly means you fund the other side's mistakes.
A duty to defend that starts on the day a claim is filed, whatever its merit, and that no cap on damages restricts.
Indemnity extended to "affiliates" and "officers", which enlarges the number of people who can call on it.
Survival past termination — an indemnity usually outlives the agreement it lives in, and often has no end date at all.

Wordings Worth Stopping At

Search your own document for these before you read anything else in the clause.

"any and all claims"

Removes the link between the claim and your conduct. This is the single wording that turns an indemnity from a risk allocation into an open cheque.

"arising out of or relating to"

"Relating to" is far wider than "arising out of" and is read broadly by courts. Where you can only change one word in the clause, change this one.

"indemnify, defend and hold harmless"

Three obligations wearing one coat. "Defend" is the expensive one and the one that operates before anyone has been found liable.

no reference to the liability cap

If the cap does not say it covers indemnities, the indemnity sits outside it — and the cap you negotiated protects nothing that matters.

one-way drafting in a two-way deal

Both sides create third-party risk in most commercial relationships. An indemnity that runs one way is a negotiating position, not a standard.

Who It Protects

The party receiving the indemnity It converts an uncertain, uninsured risk into someone else's obligation, and it can be called on without proving breach of contract.

The larger party, almost always Indemnities travel down the supply chain. The party with more negotiating power hands the risk to the party with less margin to absorb it.

Neither side, when it is mutual and capped A balanced indemnity is not a win for anyone — it is insurance, and it is what most commercial agreements should end up with.

What Is Normally Negotiable

Limit it to third-party claims caused by your negligence or breach. This is the normal commercial position and the easiest change to justify: you should carry the risk you create, and not the risk they create.

Bring the indemnity inside the liability cap, or give it its own. A cap that excludes indemnities protects only the risks that were never going to be large.

Replace "defend" with a duty to indemnify against reasonable costs. You still pay for justified claims, but you are not funding lawyers for a claim that has not been tested.

Add a notice and control mechanism. If you are paying for the defence, you should be told about the claim promptly and have a say in how it is settled.

Make it mutual. The clearest test of whether a clause is reasonable is whether the party proposing it will accept the same words pointed the other way.

How LegalValidate Reads an Indemnification Clause

The review reads the whole document and reports six scores out of ten, each with the reasoning behind it. Here is where this clause shows up in that.

The analysis reads the whole document and reports six scores out of ten with a sentence explaining each. An uncapped or one-sided indemnity shows up in Balance of Terms and Overall Risk Exposure, and the sentence names what it found rather than only scoring it.
Where an indemnity exists but the liability cap does not mention it, that combination is what the reasoning describes — the two clauses are usually pages apart, which is exactly why reading them together is hard by eye.
The `issue_count` returned with the scores is the number of concrete weaknesses a rewrite would fix. An indemnity of this shape is normally one of them.
It is a document review, not legal advice, and it cannot tell you how a particular court will read a particular sentence.

Check the indemnification clause in your own contract

Upload it and read the whole analysis — every score and every explanation, against this clause and the rest of the document. Free, no account needed.

Drop your contract here

or click to select

Supported formats: .pdf, .docx, .txt — up to 2 MB

Analysis Results

Upload a document to see the analysis

Documents Where This Clause Matters Most

Each of these pages says what the review checks in that kind of agreement.

Service Agreement Review it free → Vendor & Supplier Contract Review it free → Consulting Agreement Review it free → SaaS Agreement Review it free →

Indemnification Clause — Questions

What is the difference between indemnity and liability? +

Liability is what you owe the other party when you breach the contract. An indemnity is a promise to cover losses from claims brought by someone else — a customer, a regulator, a third party — and it can be triggered without any breach at all. That is why a liability cap which does not mention indemnities leaves the largest risk uncapped.

Is "hold harmless" different from "indemnify"? +

In practice they are usually read together, and in several jurisdictions "hold harmless" is treated as adding little. The word that genuinely changes your obligation is "defend", because it makes you fund a defence before anyone has decided whether the claim is good.

Should indemnification survive termination? +

Usually yes — claims often arrive after a relationship ends. What is worth negotiating is not whether it survives but for how long: an indemnity with no end date is an obligation you can never close a file on.

How do I check the indemnity in my own contract? +

Upload it here. You get all six scores and the reasoning behind each, free and without an account, and the reasoning names the specific clauses it is worried about.